Lighthouse Letter VII – The safety to go slow

By: Maya Bahoshy 

The Safety to Go Slow
Fast-forwarding through life

A friend handed me her phone to listen to a podcast of Mary Oliver’s beautiful poem Wild Geese. As I was listening, I noticed something felt different, calmer. An ease and a focus settled in my body.

I then realised she was actually listening to her podcasts at x0.8!

Take one look at my phone and you’ll see that my podcasts and audiobooks are set to at least x1.5. While I appreciate that our brains process at different speeds, this stark difference had me questioning whether that was the real reason, or whether my need for speed was driven by an internal motor pushing me to consume more, to achieve more.

My friend, in turn, had given her brain the space to truly hear, her body the time to deeply feel, and the learnings the chance to be fully experienced, so that her life could be changed by them.

As I listened to the podcast at x0.8, I realised that it wasn’t just the audio I was running at x1.5. I was trying to fast-forward my way through life, through learning, rushing past moments, cramming experiences in, and rarely stopping to savour, taste, notice, feel.

That has been one of many moments that have helped me realise that humanity is being driven to live life at a speed that is not natural for us as humans, as part of the intricate web of nature, and the adoption of AI has only nudged us into an even higher gear.

Why we need to go slow

We are living in a world where there are continual signs that we are going too fast: the increasing rate of burnout of individuals, companies, countries and the planet. We have become addicted to the need for constant change. While I appreciate that change is the only constant, the rate of change is indicative of an underlying issue. How much of our need to change is because we haven’t taken the time to think about the change in the first place?

Systemic work invites us, or rather requires us, to go slow, allowing us to sink into the world, our experience and our knowledge, and to connect with wisdom, in order to make meaningful shifts.

Learning is inherently a systemic practice. Through learning, we reshape the building blocks that make up the way we think about, perceive and act upon the world, whatever the subject.

And yet, more often than not, we find ourselves trying to rush it, to cram it, to achieve, forgetting that the learning itself must be recognised as the most important outcome.

So how do we allow ourselves to slow down?

The challenge of slowing down

Being told to slow down, unsurprisingly, does not actually lead us to slow down.

The fear of being left behind, of not achieving, of not “succeeding” is deeply embedded within us. We are also living in an economic system that rewards production and productivity, and as we deal with a growing cost-of-living crisis, this reality cannot be avoided.

As a result, many of us have developed a deeply somatic, internalised drive. When we slow down, our nervous systems go into a panic, seen and felt in the racing thoughts of “am I doing enough?”, the anxiety that we will not get to the end, the constant search for something to do.

David Pontalier, after joining a few Practice sessions, described them as a luxury spa. But as in much of the self-care world, we are starting to realise that what we deem a luxury may in fact be a necessity, currently only afforded to those privileged enough to take a step back.

However, our bodies, and the world, are showing us that it is a necessity for all.

Yet permission is not enough; we need safety.

How do we create the safety to go slow?

I have been running Communities of Practice as part of the Minds community for 18 months, and one of my biggest learnings is that these spaces are fundamentally vital in helping us shift the way we think about and move through the world. And yet, it has been a process to create a space that allows us to move slowly.

I still carry this question as I learn and practise. To date, we have found a few things that help us reduce the pressure to “produce” in the typical sense, and instead reset our processes and thinking.

Firstly, we always start by taking a moment to arrive, to connect, and to appreciate the importance of slowing down to see everyone in the room and acknowledge their presence.

We introduce an inspiration (a piece of art, a poem or a quote) that shifts the pattern and speed of our brains.

We remind each other that the focus is driven by the learning question, rather than by the definite creation of an output.

We have introduced the Japanese concept of Ma, the intentional pause that is not an empty void but an active presence where space and potential can exist. After moments of deep discussion, brainstorming and idea generation, we allow the field to settle in a pause, to see what needs to emerge.

I invite you to do the same now. Take a deep breath and pause.

Finally, we take time at the end of each session to help land the intangible learnings, as a reminder of all that is happening in our minds, hearts and bodies during the session. It reminds us that even in the slowness, in the seemingly “unproductive luxury”, we often leave with even more profound learning.

What I have noticed is that when we allow ourselves those 90 minutes to connect with each other and with the question of inquiry, the learning, realisations and actions land more deeply, often in unexpected but much-needed areas.

An invitation

Slowing down will take practice. I may still listen to podcasts at x1.3 occasionally, and struggle to shift my motor into a lower gear, but I am increasingly grateful for these weekly sessions where I can practise the art of moving more slowly, yet with deep purpose. I hope you will have the chance to join me one day.

In the meantime, I leave you with this powerful invitation from Bayo Akomolafe:

“These times are urgent, let’s slow down.”

Building learning communities with low time preference

It is Black Friday, and I believe that is the perfect day to share my understanding of the concept “of “low time preference”, and how this principle can be used while building a community…or anything else, really.

What is time preference?

In economics, time preference is the current relative valuation placed on receiving a good or some cash at an earlier date compared with receiving it at a later date*1. In other words, it measures how patient you are to get results out of your efforts or your money.

A practical example: Jim and Bob go out for a drink but Jim has no money so Bob lends Jim $10. The next day Jim visits Bob and says, “Bob, you can have $10 now, or I will give you $15 when I get paid at the end of the month.” Bob’s time preference will change depending on his trust in Jim, whether he needs the money now, or if he thinks he can wait; or if he’d prefer to have $15 at the end of the month rather than $10 now.

Black Friday is peak high preference. Every business and individual is trying to maximise returns of their investments today. When the macroeconomic environment is unstable, the amount of high preference decisions increases. Everyone is trying to sell as much as possible and get profits, fast.

What is low time preference?

Low time preference, instead, is about building for the long run independently of the current circumstances. Instead of maximising the return of the investment today, it is about maximising the value generated in the future.

Yes, that is hard.

We can find examples of low time preference projects in all trades. One of my favourite low time preference projects is the Sagrada Familia, in Barcelona. Construction started in 1882 led by Antonio Gaudí, and is still unfinished (!). “My client is not in a hurry.” he said about a project that he probably knew he would not see finished in his lifetime. This construction currently attracts 5 million visitors, generating 17M € in revenue annually.

The roof of the Sagrada Familia seen from the inside.

Every day we face high time vs low time preference choices. Fast food or home cooked meals? Social media or reading a book? Going for a drink or going for a run? Your physical and mental health will be affected by each of those micro-decisions. Like it or not.

Not only our personal life is affected by high vs low time preference. At work, it is up to you to build long term relationships or quick transactional deals. We can build for an economy of hire fast and fire faster, or we can invest in growing something strong together. We can take strategic decisions looking at this quarter’s results, or at the company’s mission. It is always the same principle at play. Simon Sinek calls it The Infinite Game:

Low time preference education

Education doesn’t escape the high time preference vs low time preference principle. Studying the last day for an exam, trying to pass without thinking about absorbing knowledge or skills, is a high time preference decision.

However, when we look at it in depth, any valuable skill builds up on a low time preference process. You didn’t learn to read – a skill you practise every day- with a “0 to hero” course. It takes time. It requires a sustained effort. It meant you had to focus on a specific task repeatedly, many days, without noticing much progress each time. Low time preference at its best.

As a product, I believe education is one of the lowest time preference options you can choose in life. In buying a car, the benefits are perceived instantly. However, in purchasing a “second language course”, the benefits will be only felt after sustained effort, whenever we need to use that language in the future.

Low time preference at the Studio

At Minds Studio, I am determined to build a low time preference business with people who are aligned to this principle. This means we would like to invest in long lasting relationships with our clients and employees, build sustainable business models, and long lasting learning experiences.

When building a learning community, the temptation is to cut corners. Using money to artificially provide an illusion of engagement, “magical results” and hoping that big promises will generate an “explosion” of growth. On the contrary, the low time preference approach of growing a strong base of appreciated members who trust each other to grow together is generally seen as “not fast enough”. We work with businesses and individuals who understand that building for the long term means to grow slower but stronger.

If any of these principles resonate with you, please do not hesitate to leave your contact details here so we can have a -low time preference- chat about the community you are building.

*1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_preference

Learning is a team sport, not a single player game.

At Minds Studio, we are in constant experimentation and sometimes new revelations appear along the way and change our world. One of the most transformative ones has been the following change of paradigm:

Learning is not a single player game, but a team sport.

This is not intuitive, as we have spent our lives in schools and universities who approached teaching as a “single player” game. We were assessed by our individual performance through tests and exams designed to measure our knowledge, skill, or how we can apply both to solve problems.

Do you want to learn to play an instrument? Take classes and practice to pass the exam.

Do you want to learn maths? Do your homework, go to class, get a tutor, pass the exam.

This approach leads to the “study to the test” we all know, whose effectiveness for long term skill development are far from ideal . The majority of people take the classes, pass the exam, do their homework and…

…They forget most of it fast.*1

At Minds Studio we realised that, in order for our learning experience designs to stand the test of time, we could not only look at this activity from the individual perspective, but we needed to add a new variable: the learning community.

Because we have all experienced what a team sport is. A group of individuals coming together regularly to contribute individual efforts towards an elevated goal (win the match, classify to the next round, etc.).

Sometimes, people just gather for practising their skills (like basketball training, or a tennis class). But other times, they gather in front of an audience to assess and test their skills (as we evaluate for the next karate belt, or we play a football tournament over the weekend). In those special moments, people usually invite their loved ones (friends, family, partners…) and they celebrate their successes -when they happen- together.

And this is important.

Do team sports generate knowledge and skills in each participant? YES

Do those skills stand the test of time? YES, much better than if we were playing alone.

Why don’t we do this when we learn a new skill at school?

…hmm…hmm…

Designing learning with the community in mind

After careful consideration, we realised that if we wanted to commit to designing the best learning experiences possible, we could not limit ourselves to the individual. We had to understand the learning environments as much as learning process or outcomes*2.

Model of the LEPO framework, by Rob Phillips, Camel McNaught and Gregor Kennedy available HERE on ResearchGate

Going back to our earlier sports example, think about what needs to go right in order to become a karateka:

  1. Find the right Dojo (‘Dojo’ is a Japanese word that means ‘place of the pursuit’ . The word ‘do’ meaning ‘the way’ or ‘the pursuit’ and ‘jo’ meaning ‘a place’) – The right learning environment
  2. Find the right teacher and practice regularly throught the different levels during a sustained period of time (Apparently, around 5 years to reach the black belt) – The right learning process
  3. Demonstrate certain skills that build up on top of each other every time you are assessed in order to “be awarded” the next belt. – The right learning outcomes

Generally, once you approach the mastering of a skill, the way to keep the “muscle of learning” active, is to continuously use it and start teaching it to others – as it usually happens in martial arts-.

What does “community learning” mean?

Education has been mostly focused on the learning outcomes (Generally crystallised by degrees or certificates) and the learning processes ( Which are mostly determined by the teachers). Little attention has been given to the learning environment, especially to the interactions of the learning community. This is actually the key element that keeps the learner coming back to continuously learn, even after the assessment (exam, test, etc.) has passed.

“Community” is a magic word that most projects aspire to have, but very few really dedicate the efforts and resources it deserves, given its importance on long-term effectiveness during the learning journey.

“Community” is hard, because it is complex. As any “environment”, it is a combination of little details that make you feel welcome, or excited, or it could very easily turn into cold or too much for me.

“Community” is not just a network of people, although many people just refer to their network as such. Community is a group of people who keep coming together over what they care about*3. A course has an end date, if we really care about what we learned, we should continue to be connected after all the coursework is done.

A community uses technology, but it is not a tech tool.

The same way a cook will use different utensils to prepare a great dish, a great learning community will need a lot of tools, but the tools themselves won’t solve the problem. You would be going to bed hungry if nobody acted on the tools and the processes needed to enjoy a good meal. Learning communities need human minds to build the environment, the process and the outcomes so it evokes the feeling in the learner that the journey is seamless.

Many companies try to solve the “community” problem by just providing tools to their users, and waiting for them to engage with them. Our experience is that that it just won’t work.

Our commitment to building inspiring communities

We believe any company or institution that aims to educate people to acquire skills, tools or knowledge, are in the business of building a learning community. However, we also know many of them don’t know it yet.

We aim to become a reliable partner in the process of building and nurturing effective and inspiring learning communities, and we are changing our work focus at the Studio accordingly.

In order to do that, we know we need to find the best talent (learning designers, experience designers, tech experts, product managers, etc.) to work with us on that journey. We also need to find the companies daring to invest in an intangible but strategic asset for their businesses.

We will explain more about our community learning framework soon. If you’d like to know more about it, please register below:

*1 “Exploring Cramming: Student Behaviors, Beliefs, and Learning Retention in the Principles of Marketing”. Shelby H. McIntyre and J. Michael Munson.

*2 “Towards a generalised conceptual framework for learning: the Learning Environment, Learning Processes and Learning Outcomes (LEPO) framework”. Rob Phillips, Carmel McNaught, Gregor Kennedy.

*3 “Get together: How to build a community with your people” Bailey Richardson, Kevin Huynh, Kai Elmer Sotto.